Nelson Law Group
Employment Law Attorneys
SF Bay Area : 415-689-6590
Toll Free : 866-290-0424

Former California principal alleges pregnancy discrimination

It seems hardly believable that a school district in this modern age wouldn't have a policy in place to deal with the maternity leave of one of its administrators.

Yet, that's precisely what the former principal of a California elementary school is alleging. Perhaps worse, the district admits that it wasn't pleased with her pregnancy or requests for accommodation but fails to see that as a problem.

An investigation by the school district into the then-principal's discrimination complaint said that officials had merely focused on "managing" the news of the unmarried principal's pregnancy and other practical concerns. It also admitted that district officials were "annoyed" over the principal's repeated inquiries regarding maternity leave. However, it said that none of that was discriminatory nor led to any discriminatory actions.

The former principal and her attorneys say that the discrimination seems fairly clear. From the first meeting after the newly-hired principal announced her pregnancy to district officials onward she experienced hostility:

-- The district refused to accommodate her after she was told to reduce her work hours in the last weeks of her pregnancy.

-- She was told she'd have to attend multiple out-of-town meetings even though she was still recovering from a C-section delivery.

-- She was told that she was not permitted to bring her daughter, who was breastfed, on the out-of-town trips.

-- She had received above-average evaluations until she finally filed a complaint with the district about the lack of accommodation and discrimination. Then she received a poor annual performance review.

-- When she requested information about the investigation into her discrimination complaint and was told the district had found none, she wasn't permitted to see the full report.

-- She was abruptly relieved of her position and reassigned to a teaching position instead.

The district claimed her dismissal was due to concerns about staff morale, failure in her leadership, her lack of presence at the school, failure to respond to communications, failure to follow through on commitments and over-delegation.

While the case has yet to be tried in court, there certainly seems to be some classic hallmarks of pregnancy discrimination and retaliation, including disparate treatment, unreasonable demands, a refusal to make medically-necessary accommodations and, ultimately, a sudden poor performance rating and demotion after making a complaint.

If you've experienced similar workplace discrimination after a pregnancy, consider talking to an attorney today.

Source: Los Angeles Times Valley Sun, "Former La Canada principal details maternity bias allegations while school board stands by superinendent," Sara Cardine, Jan. 12, 2017

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information


Representing both employers and employees makes me a better lawyer, because I know how the other side thinks.

Read More


I can provide the same level of service as a large law firm, but more efficiently and at a lower cost.

Read More

How Can We Help ?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Keep In Touch

Nelson Law Group
345 West Portal Avenue
Suite 110
San Francisco, California 94127

Toll Free: 866-290-0424
Phone: 415-689-6590
Fax: 415-592-8671
Map & Directions
San Francisco Law Office Map